File #: TMP-1701   
Type: Ordinance Status: Regular Agenda
File created: 12/30/2025 In control: City Council
On agenda: 1/8/2026 Final action:
Title: FOR RECONSIDERATION BY REASON OF THE MAYOR’S VETO - ORD. NO. 30550 M.C.S. - CAL. NO. 35,324 - BY: COUNCILMEMBERS GIARRUSSO, MORRELL, MORENO, HARRIS, KING, GREEN AND THOMAS Brief: An Ordinance to respond to the current budget challenges facing the City of New Orleans through a temporary prohibition on spending any funds received from the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans ( “SWBNO”), American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”), Council of the City of New Orleans v. Edward Wisner Donation, et al., Case No. 2022-06765, Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans (“Wisner litigation”), or any other new sources of revenue; and otherwise to provide with respect thereto. Annotation: (This matter was introduced 12/4/25). VOTE ON THE QUESTION: "SHALL THE ORDINANCE PASS, THE OBJECTION OF THE MAYOR NOTWITHSTANDING?” (GREEN VOTE OVERRULES - RED VOTE SUSTAINS). THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE ORDINANCE VETOED BY THE MAYOR WAS RETURNED TO THE CLERK OF COUNCIL AND AT THE COUNCIL’S NEXT REGULAR M...
Attachments: 1. 35324

Title

FOR RECONSIDERATION BY REASON OF THE MAYOR’S VETO - ORD. NO. 30550 M.C.S. - CAL. NO. 35,324 - BY: COUNCILMEMBERS GIARRUSSO, MORRELL, MORENO, HARRIS, KING, GREEN AND THOMAS

 

Brief:

An Ordinance to respond to the current budget challenges facing the City of New Orleans through a temporary prohibition on spending any funds received from the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans ( “SWBNO”), American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”), Council of the City of New Orleans v. Edward Wisner Donation, et al., Case No. 2022-06765, Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans (“Wisner litigation”), or any other new sources of revenue; and otherwise to provide with respect thereto.

 

Annotation:

(This matter was introduced 12/4/25).

 

VOTE ON THE QUESTION: "SHALL THE ORDINANCE PASS, THE OBJECTION OF THE  MAYOR NOTWITHSTANDING?” (GREEN VOTE OVERRULES - RED VOTE SUSTAINS).

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE ORDINANCE VETOED BY THE MAYOR WAS  RETURNED TO THE CLERK OF COUNCIL AND AT THE COUNCIL’S NEXT REGULAR  MEETING OF DECEMBER 18, 2025, THE COUNCIL VOTED 7 YEAS AND 0 NAYS TO  OVERRULE THE MAYOR’S VETO.